Tuesday, June 12, 2007

A response to an Anonymous question

Anonymous said...

"Matthew 10 34-37 states Jesus did not come here to bring peace but with a sword. Please explain as a parent how you should love Jesus more then any other in life?"

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For many in our society Matthew 10:34-37 is a tough sword to swallow. We often don’t understand what Jesus meant when he said that he was bringing a sword, and turning family against each other. It’s why this passage has been listed among the hardest statements to understand that Jesus made.

Jesus, apart from this statement, demonstrates a life and ministry of anything but conflict. He advocated reconciliation to God and each other, and outlined that peace through His summation of the law: love God, love yourself and love others. He expected those who entered His followership to participate in non-violent protest against evil-doers telling His disciples to turn other cheeks, carry loads an extra mile, and the like.

So why did he say,

Matthew 10:32 - 38 (NIV)“Whoever acknowledges me before men, I will also acknowledge him before my Father in heaven. But whoever disowns me before men, I will disown him before my Father in heaven. “Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn
“‘a man against his father,
a daughter against her mother,
a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law—
a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’

“Anyone who loves his father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves his son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me;

and anyone who does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me.

Jesus is demonstrating his holiness here. He is stating the just side of His nature. If people deny Him, they’ll be denied; if they acknowledge Him, they’ll be acknowledged. There’s no argument then that people who don’t follow Jesus on earth will be unable to spend eternity with Him. This was not only His answer, but was the common understanding of the early church writers. Holiness brings division apart from conflict. God’s holiness divides Him from mankind, but He doesn’t hate, nor is He at conflict with mankind. But many of those separated from God by sin are at conflict with God.

Thus the second principle of what I believe Jesus is saying in this passage. Experience. I think that Jesus was expressing His experience. We learn from scripture that Jesus’ relationship with his family was strained because of His divinity (another example of division with one-sided conflict). His brothers thought He was crazy, and from what we can piece together there would have been quite a bit of division in that house. Imagine growing up with a sibling who repeatedly expressed that He had God as a father, much superior to your father. Imagine your sibling announcing that He was not from this world and that He was one with God the father. He never did anything wrong, Mom always looked at Him differently, and Dad treated him somehow differently. Yeah that would not only bring division between us as kids, but I would probably begin to resent Him, and it would probably turn sons against their fathers, daughters against mothers, son’s wives against their mother-in-law. Why? Because Jesus had been unjust? No, because He had been divided from them in holiness. I think that when Jesus quotes from the prophecy of Micah it is hitting home for Him.

Finally, I think that Jesus is expressing the effect of His coming not the purpose for His coming. Because of His coming this division came, not as the purpose of His coming. But Jesus returns to a common theme throughout his teachings and this really gets to the crux of the question posed to me. “As a parent how do you explain… “ I think that Jesus has explained it for what it is. If we love our children more than God (in Christ) we can’t follow Him. To elevate ourselves, children or anything else is idolatry. Love and worship are synonyms. To worship our children more than our Creator; to love anything more than the One who taught us what love is, is not following Jesus. Jesus frames it in the light of familial relationship and also our relationship to ourself. If we try to hold on to our life we lose it, if we lose it for Christ’s sake we find the best life.

So how does it play out in my life? Do I hate or despise my children? Am I at conflict with my family? No. I love my children. (In fact, I’m at a place where I get to love a child that hasn’t popped out yet.) But I love Jesus more than anything in my life. My wife knows that I am more committed to worshipping Jesus than her. My children will know that I’m more committed to Jesus than to them. Following Jesus is the most important thing in my life. I have laid down my life, dreams, and aspirations to Him. And what do I receive for that? A great relationship with a wife that loves Jesus more than me, and that’s the relationship with my children that I hope to have. I have greater dreams and aspirations, in short a better life because everything in live is despised compared to my commitment to Christ. Remember that pianos tuned to the same tuning fork are already in tune with each other. The closer I get to Christ, the closer I am to my wife who is getting closer to Him.

If you struggle to love Jesus more than your children, you’re not alone. Jesus regularly encountered people that had something that kept them from following him be it money, family, or personal ambition. But I can promise you this. Your children will never have a better father or mother than one who loves Jesus Christ foremost and follows His teachings. My advice would be to place Jesus as the most sought after pursuit of your life. Give everything to Him, even your children and dare I say control. Do we think we can love our children, want a great life for them, or provide for them more than God does?

Hope that helps, and sorry for the delay. As you can see it takes time to write this much.

--Ben

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thanks, as for your response it will take a while for me to ponder as well.
Again thanks

b4d6uy said...

Just a small nit about a portion of your response...you said, "His summation of the law: love God, love yourself and love others."

He never actually said, 'love yourself' - it was kind of implied in the statement 'love your neighbor as [you love] yourself.'

Is this a significant difference? I've usually heard this verse brought up in the context of 'self-worth' and 'self-image' that one ought to be comfortable with - in fact love themselves. For someone that is consumed with egoism, and self-centeredness -this could be a distracting if not destructive interpretation of this passage; giving them license, as it were, to put themselves first before others.

Alas, it would have been good boat discussion material...

Jeff

Ben Rainey said...

You're right in saying that the love yourself command is implicit, but I think that it is most certainly there. The struggle we have in our society is the psycho-babel about self-esteem/image. Loving yourself is less about self-esteem and more about God-esteem. If we esteem God first, then our perspective of who we are is not one of exaltation, rather one of self-love, and the intrinsic love of others as God made us.

There is no room in God's command of self-love for egoism, self-centeredness, or the like.